Volvo XC40 and C40 Recharge get more range, raised power, higher price

All Volvo XC40 related discussions
Post Reply
User avatar
Rob
Site Admin
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2014 3:38 pm

Post by Rob »

New article on Auto Car - Volvo XC40 and C40 Recharge get more range, raised power

1-volvo-xc40-recharge-front-action_0.webp

Volvo has increased the range of the Volvo C40 Recharge and Volvo XC40 Recharge EVs with a raft of efficiency tweaks and given them an uplift in power and a slightly higher price.

The update for the Swedish marque’s entry-level electric cars – which from today cost, on average, just under £1000 more (C40 from £48,355, XC40 from £46,505) than the versions available yesterday – brings a new 82kWh (78kWh usable) battery for the most powerful dual-motor Recharge Twin, up from 78kWh.

It also ushers in a change in drivetrain for the single-motor option, with power now sent solely to the rear wheels, which, Volvo says, is to aid efficiency. Recharge Twin keep four-wheel-drive layout.

This efficiency equates to around 20 miles of increased range per single-motor model (up to 296 miles for the C40 and 286 for the XC40) although the Recharge Twin variants now have a quoted range of 316 (C40) and 312 miles (XC40) – up around 40 miles.

The update also includes a faster charging rate for the Recharge Twin of up to 200kW, slashing the 10-80% charging time by 10 minutes to 27 minutes. This matches the charging time of the smaller-battery standard models, which keep the same 150kW speed.

Power rises across the range too, with a more powerful motor for the standard car increasing output from 228bhp to 235bhp. The already beefy Recharge Twin receives two different electric motors – 161bhp at the front and 242bhp at the rear (previously 201bhp front and rear) – but retains the same overall 402bhp output.

Production of the updated models, all now available to order, will begin in May for the Recharge Twin and the single-motor variant will arrive from the autumn.

Deleted User 4296

Post by Deleted User 4296 »

Looking at full electric v's Toyota Yaris cross 4th gen self-charging hybrid, I know it's maybe not as glam as an XC40 or as powerful and quick, but here is my point - electricity is 34p kwh and will rise to at least 40p in April, generally you get (when new and warm conditions) 3.4 miles to the kwh, that's 11.76p per mile come April. The self-charging full hybrid will use 3.4lts to do100km, that's 8.7p per mile - 10mins at the pump and it will cover another 650miles. Add then to the mix the extra premium of 000's to buy full electric and the sums just don't stack up?
eugen61
Posts: 1221
Joined: Sun May 10, 2020 7:33 am

Post by eugen61 »

Every detail of the new MY24 XC40 and C40 is presented in this video:

Deleted User 4296

Post by Deleted User 4296 »

Just a thought - if electric prices continue to rise and petrol prices fall, as predicted - what will folk buy?
eugen61
Posts: 1221
Joined: Sun May 10, 2020 7:33 am

Post by eugen61 »

Falling petrol prices on commodity markets might not necessarily translate in cheaper gas at the pump. Governments could increase taxes on fuel in order to push folk towards EVs. But one thing is sure, those tens of billions of dollars sunk by the automotive industry in EV R&D and production facilities will be reflected in the future on the price tag of every car, EV and ICE alike.
Deleted User 4296

Post by Deleted User 4296 »

When ICE is no longer available then the choice is made easy, but for now, I know many that feel they rushed into thinking that the premium cost to buy electric would be re-cupped quite quickly with the PPM (pence per mile) savings, only to realise this is fast being eroded (and likely) may even be reversed
Deleted User 4296

Post by Deleted User 4296 »

The savings for running pure electric against petrol. It is explained that a petrol XC40 consumes 7.7-8 liters/100 miles according to WLTP figures, it's then explain that the estimated saving over 20k miles running pure electric v's petrol is £4823. If petrol cost £1.6 per liter that's £12.80 for 8-liters , @ 100 miles this equates to 12.8p per mile. Electric is approx £0.32 per Kwh, and a pure electric consumption is approx 3.4 miles per Kwh, this equates to 9.4p per mile. A saving over petrol of 3.4p per mile. Over 20k miles this would be a saving of £680? If this is right, can anyone explain where the other £4143 of savings comes from?
eugen61
Posts: 1221
Joined: Sun May 10, 2020 7:33 am

Post by eugen61 »

Savings figures stated by Volvo might not be updated to current energy and petrol prices. The £4143 saving probably includes other governmental incentives together with Volvo offering free 1 year road tax, 1 year VED tax and 3 years service.
Cevoli21
Posts: 299
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2021 8:38 am

Post by Cevoli21 »

If you can charge on Octopus go at 7pence per kw/h then that makes a big difference. The 3 years servicing is a bit disingenuous. Unless you are doing well above average mileage this is only one service at the end of year two. Ours has 3 years insurance included which certainly helps. They probably also include the Newmotion charger which proved impossible to get. Instead Volvo just paid £500 towards a wallbox of our choice.
XC40 P8 Twin Motor Pro in Denim Blue with Tow bar, mudflaps
Deleted User 4296

Post by Deleted User 4296 »

@eugen61 - the savings were just fuel savings. @Cevoli21 - Octopus go is 12p night rate, and still sounds a good rate at today's hyper rates, but you do have to factor in the 41.64p day rate, which is over 9p more than the default rate of 32p. And at 12p that still is only a saving of £1840 over 20k miles, £2983 short?
Post Reply